Michael Wolfe

Study up. Stand up. Speak up. Pray up!

Posts Tagged ‘gender’

eHarmony: Moves beyond “traditional” Marriage

Posted by americana83 on November 21, 2008

Well, thanks to a cranky person/s, who could have went to any of a dozen other websites to find their same-sex “love,” and a spineless eHarmony, we now have a company forced to create a new website catering to a whole new set of clients.

Why they chose to go to a website that is built for heterosexuals, and seems to cater to a more conservative crowd I’ll never understand, unless it was just to force someone else to embrace their chosen (yes, I said it: Chosen!) lifestyle.

This sets a dangerous precident.  eHarmony, certainly a rich company from all the subscribers paying 15+ dollars a month “couldn’t afford” to defend its rights, what is next? Where will it stop?

According to this article, the lawsuit is still going on (eHarmony loses!) and anyone who logged on and was “denied” access can join the lawsuit.

The lawyer for the cranky persons, had the audacity to say this:

“it’s encouraging that after years of discrimination, eHarmony looks like they might be turning a corner, but it doesn’t change our case. It can’t … be a separate but equal type of situation.”

eHarmony wasn’t discriminating, they were catering to specific clients for whom their compatibility models and resources were designed. So now eHarmony has to create a new site, and invest capital to create something that will never be as profitable as their hetero-specialty? And this lawyer complains? Obviously, moral points aside for now, a hetero-geared site is going to be quite different from an alternate-sexuality site.

eHarmony, in forfeiting its rights, actually will likely suffer a double loss. Not only will the “Compatible Partners” site never be as profitable as eHarmony (especially given the most generously over-exaggerated estimates of 10% of the population seeking after same-sex) but they will also likely lose a good portion of their conservative and Christian target market.

This also opens the door to any other fringe group who was ever denied access to a dating, or other site. Lets take a non-sinful example: poor people. They can’t afford eHarmony’s fees. Class action lawsuit: result? FreEharmony.  How about animal “lovers”? Lawsuit: Compatible Critters??? And on and on.

I don’t know if its a manned address, but you can call or email and voice your discouragement over eHarmony’s failing to stand up for its rights as a private company, allegedly founded on Christian principles here.

Perhaps I’m being too hard on eHarmony, perhaps eHarmony saw the writing on the wall with the incoming president-elect’s iron-clad commitment to non-biblical relationships. He is planning laws and regulations that might even make articles like this written at later dates “hate crimes,” or, more properly THOUGHT CRIME!

Posted in intolerance, sexuality, Spirituality | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

California: Communist Terror Groups welcome!

Posted by americana83 on March 5, 2008

You can see the full text of the bill, and what is deleted from current CA law here:

This bill allows groups that advocate the violent overthrow of the US Government to not only rent government buildings for meetings or events, but also to teach in the Public School and university system! I’ve sometimes joked about California being communist, but this is no joke. California is really going off the deep end. When all is said and done, the only things California school children will learn in the classroom are:

Communism = Good

Homosexuality = Good (see SB 777 and Assembly Bill 394)(and if you don’t think so, your racist)
Drugs = Good

USA = Bad

Christians = Evil

And all this leads to one other false comparison Arnold Schwarzenegger = Republican. Ha ha, It’d actually be funny if he wasn’t messing with the minds of over 6 million children still trapped in California’s public school system. Who knows, he may end up helping the courts force home-schooled children into the mental madness that is the California public school system.

Posted in california, children, Christianity, communism, intolerance, public schools, Racism, sexuality, social spending, Spirituality, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

America owes the LGBT “community”?

Posted by americana83 on February 23, 2008

Barack believe America owes the LGBT community, but what does America owe it? The “right” to marry? Marriage is nowhere guaranteed in the constitution. Further marriage by any major dictionary is a union between a man and a woman. They want to fundamentally rewrite the language of the nation to accommodate their lifestyle. They want sexual orientation, cross dressing, and transgenderism to be protected classes, privy to the same protections as women and ethnic minorities. If this happens, it will be the first time a non-physical changeable condition will be protected under federal discrimination law. The advocacy of this makes a mockery of the whole civil rights movement and criminalizes the thought and actions and beliefs of Christianity which are based on the Bible.

Gay City News Endorsement (From Barack Obama’s official campaign website)
(Bold words were highlighted by me)

In a presidential inaugural address that inspired a teenager from Hope, Arkansas named Bill Clinton, John F. Kennedy famously urged Americans to focus not on what the country could do for them, but on what contributions they could make to the nation.

Mind you, we in the LGBT community are not yet nearly at the point where this nation has made good on the contributions it owes to our lives, our families, our well-being, even our equal citizenship. Faced with the choice of two progressive Democrats who have spoken at length and with conviction about the challenges facing our lives, we still don’t have the luxury of picking a candidate who will advocate for our right to marry. We must yet take it on faith that the next president will have the fortitude to insist that Congress – including too many stragglers within the Democratic Party – open up the nation’s military to out gay and lesbian patriots. It is far from certain that the next time the Democratic Congress takes up an employment nondiscrimination measure it will include transgendered Americans as well as gay men and lesbians among those protected.

But after seven years of George W. Bush, and compared against the prospect of either John McCain or Mitt Romney, Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama truly offer hope to LGBT Americans that help is on the way.

Given that the two Democratic contenders share a similar, generally friendly and supportive posture toward LGBT Americans, we ought to think about the message our choice sends about a fundamental question – what our politics should be all about. We are finding our place here and there at the table, but we have also spent much of our life on the outside. The nation needs to hear our views on how American politics can accommodate new voices in the mix.

Judged by that measure and taking full stock of how the Democratic nomination contest has unfolded, we believe the choice is clear.

Gay City New endorses Barack Obama.

Because the government does not have  a special recognition of 2 people’s relationship does not mean they are unequal citizens. I would rather America remove any and all financial, tax, and social benefits of Marriage than to have the meaning of the word redefined so a certain segment of the population can feel better about itself and how the government endorses its relationships.

Posted in Barack Obama, Christianity, deception, Election 2008, Hillary Clinton, Legal, Obama, Presidential, sexuality, social spending | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Content of our Character: Why America has not come as far as we think

Posted by americana83 on February 23, 2008

As we near the end of Black History Month, let us consider the famous words of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr:

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

That is the dream, whereby man would look beyond the surface and judge men by their values, beliefs and standards. Much progress has been made in that direction in America.

We have gone from a time where the legal system looked another way when a black man whistled at a white woman. Racism has been evicted from America’s public square. By and large it only finds refuge in the hearts of men (and women) who’s hearts are hardened, who’s minds are narrow, who’s only claim to self worth is the putting down of another based on the color of their skin.

Today, however, skin color has again returned to America’s public square. As we race towards the 2008 presidential elections, change has become the buzz word. In many circles the prospect of a Black or woman president has trumped all other issues.

McCain, Bush, the Clintons are painted as stogy old white establishment types. Relative youth and skin color are trumpeted as the best assets of a candidate this year, in 2008.
The truth of the matter is this: once you peel off the surface, there is no substantial difference in the agendas that will be pursued by a President Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama.

There is a song that has been co-opted in some areas as a sort of theme song for this years election season: Matchbox 20′s “How far we’ve come.” The music video to this song seems to attempt a historical chronology of the women’s and civil rights movements, cumulating in cheering images of Barack Obama’s and Hillary’s supporters.

There is no doubt that the Civil Rights Movement and certain aspects of the women’s movement have legitimately leveled the social and economic playing fields. However, the problem comes when the cumulation of these efforts is presented as Hillary and Obama. The Euphoria over the potential of a “first” black/woman candidate has completely hijacked democrats and would be social progressives. Any attack that would be directed at Obama’s policies or values can, and sometimes is, twisted into racism. Gender and skin tone becomes a defense in liu of answers.

Barack Obama himself says he is gaging racism by whether or not whites vote for him.

“If I do well in Iowa, and if I do well in New Hampshire . . . then by the time we get to South Carolina, I think we will have dispelled the notion that somehow whites won’t vote for African Americans.” -SOURCE

This is audacious in every sense of the word. Ignoring the issues and diving straight for the cover all. I would vote for the President regardless of his or her color, that stands closest to what is best for America.

Barack Obama’s massive spending/taxing plans, advocacy for homosexuality, blanket amnesty for illegal immigrants, abortion views to the left of NARAL and NOW, coolness towards Israel, and his flippant attitude towards drugs will send this nation on a crash course with economic recession and moral decline. Ultimately the other 2 candidates, Hillary and McCain, are watered down versions of Obama’s radicalism (though in Hillary‘s case only very slightly so).

It will send the message: Skin matters more than issues.

It sure seemed like we’ve come along way since Dr King’s famous speech. However, here we are as a nation still judging people by the color of their skin.

It will only be a matter of time before we are all judged for our actions this year. This election has the potential to change the heart and soul of a nation.

If you LOVE America, if you sincerely want the best for this country look behind the smooth talking, the glitzy publicity war, the buzz words and rock concert style slogans and chantings.

Look at the issues. Pray. We’re not voting for the next American Idol here. Image and stage presence are not going to save us all.

King was murdered for his bold position, that all men are equal. If you love civil rights, if you support on any level the legacy he has handed us down through the civil rights movement, then reject the politics of “famous firsts.” Focus on the issues. Focus on America.

Let’s live the dream.

Posted in Barack Obama, children, Christianity, deception, Election, Election 2008, Entertainment, Hillary Clinton, International, Islam, Israel, Legal, Obama, Presidential, public schools, sexuality, social spending | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Backdoor to Gay Marriage Being Opened!

Posted by americana83 on February 9, 2008

With California and other states starting to redefine gender to be as changeable as one’s political affiliation, it is only a matter of time before a lawsuit to allow a guy and a guy to be married as a guy and a “girl” thereby effectively legalizing gay marriage without passing any laws or overturning any marriage amendment. This relatively silent movement, unless caught and killed could end marriage as we’ve always known it without a shot being fired.

Rebellion Against California’s Gender-Blending

Groups are working to help extract 10% of the students from California schools, which haven’t been friendly to Judeo-Christian moral standards for awhile (but are now actively destroying them). Since Senate Bill 777 forces deviant sexual lifestyles on children, as well as men in what used to be women’s restrooms and locker rooms.

Posted in children, Legal, public schools, sexuality | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Schwarzenegger Terminates Traditional Family

Posted by americana83 on October 14, 2007

California’s Governator has signed into law a piece of legislation banning the “homophibic” words “Mom, Dad, husband and wife.” Public schools there are prohibited from doing, saying, or using any source which shows so-called alternative lifestyles in any kind of negative light. It also applies to any organization that receives public money in California.

Thomasson said SB777 prohibits any “instruction” or school-sponsored “activity” that “promotes a discriminatory bias” against “gender” – the bill’s definition includes cross-dressing and sex changes – as well as “sexual orientation.”

“Because no textbook or instruction in California public schools currently disparages transsexuality, bisexuality, or homosexuality, the practical effect of SB777 will be to require positive portrayals of these sexual lifestyles at every government-operated school,” CCF noted.

Anythings which relies on sex as a discriminating  factor (restrooms, homecoming titles, etc) must now be made “flexible,” that is if a biological male identifies itself as a woman, it must be eligible to use the “women’s” restroom or to be homecoming “queen”

The Days of Noah:

And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart. And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.
(Genesis 6:5-7)

 But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
(Matthew 24:37)

 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;
(2 Timothy 3:1-4)

Posted in children, Christianity, Legal, public schools, sexuality | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 208 other followers