Michael Wolfe

Study up. Stand up. Speak up. Pray up!

Posts Tagged ‘healthcare’

I got interviewed before Howard Dean’s Town Hall meeting

Posted by americana83 on August 15, 2009

The people at the union hall took notice that I was the first one to arrive outside before the meeting, and once they let people in for the Town Hall, I was interviewed by one of the gentlemen in the SEIU local 1199. I was asked this question: “What is wrong with the healthcare system we have now?” Given the targeted nature of the question, I was not able to really get into the problems with HR 3200, but I did offer this answer:

I believe that insurance contracts should be translated from lawyer speak (used to deceive people) into standard English, people should know what benefits and details are in their plan. I believe we need more targeted legislation than what is being discussed now.

“Targeted in what way?”

Towards the tangled web of laws preventing trans-state competition and insurance portablity from one state to another. It will help strengthen competition and prevent one company from having a monopoly over a given geographic area.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

DC Tea Party, Just the beginning!

Posted by americana83 on July 5, 2009

Photos here!

Approximately 2500 people from across the country rallied together in the shadow of the capital building this July 4th to send Washington a message: STOP with the deficit SPENDING! Countless broken promises and trillions of dollars of pork barrel spending litter the first months of the new administration. Change so far has been an unprecedented lack of transparency coupled with quickly ramming through unread and misunderstood bills which only serve to undermine freedom and grant the government ever more intrusive and unconstitutional control over the daily actions and decisions of Americans.

The Faces of the Tea Party movement

The way forward is clear: the people must wake up. An educated electorate is the enemy of tyranny. I’m not talking about Ivy League intellectualism, but an understanding of these things: The English language, The Bible, the Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution.

The English language:

Politicians are are so good at bending words, and concealing true meanings, that they can say anything that sounds good. Knowing your words, means you can read for yourself and know your rights, and more importantly, the limits and restrictions placed on government power.

Tito compares Chavez and Obama policy, and reflects on his recent immigration to the USA

The Bible. Love it or not, most of the founding fathers had a great knowledge of the scriptures. Even those who may have been deists had a great respect for the system of morality put forth in the Good Book. It was on the 10 commandments of God that most of our laws were based. The founding fathers had a “firm reliance on Divine Providence” and it was the belief that Rights were “endowed by their Creator” that galvanized their resolve to stand up against tyranny.

The Speakers at the Tea Party made many good points and observations. I captured some, and once I get the videos formatted, will post them!

Thank you for visiting.

God bless America- Again!

Some “Tongue in cheek commentary from the National Taxpayers’  Union:

After the party: Exclusive interview with Kristen Woodruff on the Government health care system in Canada!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Exerts from Obama’s Feb 13th Speech, and my comments

Posted by americana83 on February 18, 2008

For our economy, our safety, and our workers, we have to rebuild America. I’m proposing a National Infrastructure Reinvestment Bank that will invest $60 billion over ten years. This investment will multiply into almost half a trillion dollars of additional infrastructure spending…

And where’s that additional 500 billion dollars going to come from?

My energy plan will invest $150 billion over ten years to establish a green energy sector that will create up to 5 million new jobs over the next two decades – jobs that pay well and can’t be outsourced. We’ll also provide funding to help manufacturers convert to green technology

From what programs will this money be transferred, or better to ask, how much will taxes be raised to cover this economic spending? Those 5 million people aren’t going to work for free. Massive state companies were set up in China, and only survive by subsidy, in fact they are even selling some of them off.

I’ve paid for every element of this economic agenda – by ending a war that’s costing us billions, closing tax loopholes for corporations, putting a price on carbon pollution, and ending George Bush’s tax cuts for the wealthiest 2% of Americans.

By the way, those corporations are NOT going to absorb that added tax burden, it will be passed along to john doe consumer. Carbon pollution? Now that’s nice and vague. What are you going to do, add a carbon tax to power plants and other factories? It may sound nice to revoke those tax cuts for the “wealthiest 2%” but when you have a so-called “progressive” income tax those in the top brackets are paying the largest percentage of their incomes.

I’ve proposed a fund that would provide direct relief to victims of mortgage fraud.

Hmm, I smell more taxes

I won’t wait another ten years to raise the minimum wage – I’ll guarantee that it keeps pace with inflation every single year so that it’s not just a minimum wage, but a living wage.

Sound’s like a recipe for spiraling inflation. Whenever it becomes more expensive to produce a product, that cost is passed on the consumer, or the company finds a way to make the product more efficienty (RE: Fewer workers)

In addition to cutting costs for working families, we also need to help them save more – especially for retirement. That’s why we’ll require employers to enroll every worker in a direct deposit retirement account that places a small percentage of each paycheck into savings.

So, in addition to the necessary tax increases to fund federal social and economic spending, the government is going to be telling you what to do with YOUR money. Very nice to say a “small percentage” when for the poorest, every small percent helps!

..ban [credit card] rate changes to debt that’s already incurred; and ban interest on late fees.

Again, this sounds like a nice way to “stick it to the credit cards” however, it will only reduce credit available. As a [likely] unintentional side affect, this reduction could actually be good in the long run if it forces people to live more within their means.

Every American would be able to get the same kind of health care that members of Congress get for themselves, and we’d ban insurance companies from denying you coverage because of a pre-existing condition.

Here’s where we get into the real meat-and-potatoes of tax mania, the Universal Health Care cure-all. The thing about the government providing the health care that Obama seems to be ignorant of here, is that there would likely be little if any private market left for health insurance, hence insurance companies would cease offering health insurance, in large part to the high cost of pre-existing conditions. Example: Person needs high cost surgery, buys health insurance, gets the surgery and drops the insurance. The companies will just cease the coverage rather than see the complete draining of their monies.

And the main difference between my plan and Senator Clinton’s plan is that she’d require the government to force you to buy health insurance and she said she’d ‘go after’ your wages if you don’t. Well I believe the reason people don’t have health care isn’t because no one’s forced them to buy it, it’s because no one’s made it affordable – and that’s what we’ll do when I am President.

Presumably, Hillary would offer the same kind of “affordable” health insurance. You dodge the issue of whether or not you’d force it by merely addressing that you’d make it “affordable.” But if your going for so-called “universal health care” you are going to have to opt people into the system. Thanks but no thanks

Source for Obama Speech Quotes: barackobama.com

Posted in Barack Obama, Election, Election 2008, Entertainment, Hillary Clinton, Obama, Presidential, social spending | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

Which is less toxic?

Posted by americana83 on February 16, 2008

Looks like a whole slew of so-called conservatives have jumped on board the McCain bandwagon. It is boiling down to a choice like God gave kind David (after he sinned a great sin): Choose which of these I will do to you: Fall before your enemies, be killed by your enemies, or be plagued by the hand of God for 3 days.

No matter who wins, (save a miracle upturn by Huckabee) they will welcome with open arms both blanket amnesty for (ILLEGAL!) immigrants and gay marriage, as well as attempting to import that wonderful European socialist invention federally funded so-called universal health care.

Wait, before you say “but it will help the children!” Think about these things:

1. The federal government manages social security, the federal funded retirement plan that promises little and is sinking like the titanic in an ice field because they keep tapping money out for illegal immigrants and slush projects2. The federal government “manages” welfare

3. The federal government always goes over budget and yields a poor return.

With the government’s stellar record of managing social spending, do we really want them managing OUR healthcare, (and taxing us like the dickens!) to do it?

I for one don’t. And even if I can afford it, Hillary, I want to have the final decision on whether or not I want to opt in (and I don’t!).

Mirror mirror on the wall, who’s most socialist of them all:

3. McCain
2. Hillary
1. Obama (Endorsed by John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, and Fidel Castro, I mean this guy must be a borderline communist) (In fairness, the Castro endorsement went to Hillary too).

Posted in Election, Election 2008, Presidential, sexuality, social spending | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Wanna Buy Insurance? “NO?” Ok, We’ll Sign You Up! -Hillary

Posted by americana83 on February 6, 2008

Wanna Buy Insurance? “NO?” Ok, We’ll Sign You Up! -Hillary
Presidential Hopeful Hillary wants universal health care, and she wants everyone in the system. She said,

“What we’ve got to do is have shared responsibility. Everybody has to pay something, but obviously on a sliding scale,” Clinton said. “I think you can automatically enroll people, and you will then say, ‘You’ve got to be part of this.’”

“If you don’t start with universal health care, if you don’t say everybody’s going to be in the system, we’ll never get there,” she added.

The money will be taken from you, even if you don’t want it (but only if you could afford to pay for it). She does on to say it will only be a small percentage of your income. Great, another slice of our income going into a bloated government program that will cost so much more than it is worth.

I wonder how much of this money would be used to pay for illegal immigrants and pork barrel spending.

Viva Socialism!


Why is this socialism? It comes from the euphemism “Equitable redistribution of wealth” which basically means, if you have more money than we(the government) think you should, we are going to take from you and use it in ways we feel might benefit society, and the more you make, the larger percentage of it we will take from you. It sort of follows lenin’s old saying “from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.”

Posted in Election 2008, Hillary Clinton, Presidential | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 208 other followers