Michael Wolfe

Study up. Stand up. Speak up. Pray up!

Posts Tagged ‘Hillary’

Obama accusor accepts polygraph challenge!

Posted by americana83 on February 21, 2008

From the website Whitehouse.com

We’re not ready to share all the details about our upcoming evening lie-detecting with Obama accuser Larry Sinclair, but there are a few things that we want to tell you – namely that we’ve agreed on a time and place to carry out our wager with Mr. Sinclair.We’re going to meet him on Tuesday, February 26th at an undisclosed location in New York City. We’ve picked a polygraph expert, too: a renowned expert who has been involved in quite a few high-profile cases who we’re not going to name until the results are not only in, but have been verified by a second renowned expert.

Then, we’ll post the results, the names of both polygraph experts, and other relevant information, along with video and pictures, here on Whitehouse.com. Since the outcome of the test will be vital interest to the voting public, our findings will be made available before the presidential primaries in Texas and Ohio slated for March 4. That’s all for now, but check back for updates.

Posted in Barack Obama, deception, Election, Election 2008, Obama, Presidential, sexuality | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Barack to reality

Posted by americana83 on February 20, 2008

After perusing some new information, I can no longer truthfully claim that presidential contender Barack Obama is a socialist. It seems that Obama’s personal mentor, referred to in one of his books as “Frank” is Frank Marshal Davis. Davis is who Obama credits with helping him to find his identity. Frank Marshal Davis is a Communist. A favorable article about Frank M Davis still shows the communist aspect(Note communist buzz words like fascism, class struggle and imperialism).

And of course World Net Daily, has an article that ties in some of Barrack Obama’s current political and social communist leanings.

From the article:

Kincaid noted Obama has admitted attending “social conferences” and seeing Marxist literature. “But he ridicules the charge of being a ‘hard-core academic Marxist…’

Remember, we had a president who admitted to “smoking pot” but boldly and sincerely claimed “I did not inhale.” I would further add that the shock troops of Lenin, Mao the Viet Cong and Castro were likely not “hard-core academic Marxists” and yet they believed, they placed HOPE in the concept of communism, that it would eliminate inequality, sexism, racism, or whatever problems they were facing.

Lenin himself “campaigned” on the hope of PEACE! BREAD! LAND! Barrack Obama’s campaign is focused on PEACE! (ending the iraq war and raising peace time spending to the current war level) HEALTHCARE! (that would raise everyone’s cost of living and cost some there livings) HOPE! (a vague hope that seems solidly grounded in “change”).

Interestingly, the Bolsheviks came to power in Russia promising change to a citizenry that was tired of Czarist corruption. What they brought was one of the most abusive, abrasive and intrusive regime of the 2oth century.

So basically, Barack is NOT a socialist, he is a Communist speaking in the language of “liberal democracy and socialism” He hides his radical views in charismatic speech, catchy graphics and clever phrases. He will press for greater social spending and taxing than any president in history.

For those who think Communism is dead, consider this: over a billion people live in an openly communist country, China. The progressive income tax, universal health care, massive social spending (RE: Medicare, welfare, social security, etc) as all tenets of progressive socialism/communism, and are used as tools to extract money from private individuals and companies and give it to the government to trap the downtrodden.

I conclude with the words of a self proclaimed American Socialist:

– Norman Thomas, American socialist

Posted in Barack Obama, Election, Election 2008, Entertainment, International, Obama, Presidential, social spending | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments »

Exerts from Obama’s Feb 13th Speech, and my comments

Posted by americana83 on February 18, 2008

For our economy, our safety, and our workers, we have to rebuild America. I’m proposing a National Infrastructure Reinvestment Bank that will invest $60 billion over ten years. This investment will multiply into almost half a trillion dollars of additional infrastructure spending…

And where’s that additional 500 billion dollars going to come from?

My energy plan will invest $150 billion over ten years to establish a green energy sector that will create up to 5 million new jobs over the next two decades – jobs that pay well and can’t be outsourced. We’ll also provide funding to help manufacturers convert to green technology

From what programs will this money be transferred, or better to ask, how much will taxes be raised to cover this economic spending? Those 5 million people aren’t going to work for free. Massive state companies were set up in China, and only survive by subsidy, in fact they are even selling some of them off.

I’ve paid for every element of this economic agenda – by ending a war that’s costing us billions, closing tax loopholes for corporations, putting a price on carbon pollution, and ending George Bush’s tax cuts for the wealthiest 2% of Americans.

By the way, those corporations are NOT going to absorb that added tax burden, it will be passed along to john doe consumer. Carbon pollution? Now that’s nice and vague. What are you going to do, add a carbon tax to power plants and other factories? It may sound nice to revoke those tax cuts for the “wealthiest 2%” but when you have a so-called “progressive” income tax those in the top brackets are paying the largest percentage of their incomes.

I’ve proposed a fund that would provide direct relief to victims of mortgage fraud.

Hmm, I smell more taxes

I won’t wait another ten years to raise the minimum wage – I’ll guarantee that it keeps pace with inflation every single year so that it’s not just a minimum wage, but a living wage.

Sound’s like a recipe for spiraling inflation. Whenever it becomes more expensive to produce a product, that cost is passed on the consumer, or the company finds a way to make the product more efficienty (RE: Fewer workers)

In addition to cutting costs for working families, we also need to help them save more – especially for retirement. That’s why we’ll require employers to enroll every worker in a direct deposit retirement account that places a small percentage of each paycheck into savings.

So, in addition to the necessary tax increases to fund federal social and economic spending, the government is going to be telling you what to do with YOUR money. Very nice to say a “small percentage” when for the poorest, every small percent helps!

..ban [credit card] rate changes to debt that’s already incurred; and ban interest on late fees.

Again, this sounds like a nice way to “stick it to the credit cards” however, it will only reduce credit available. As a [likely] unintentional side affect, this reduction could actually be good in the long run if it forces people to live more within their means.

Every American would be able to get the same kind of health care that members of Congress get for themselves, and we’d ban insurance companies from denying you coverage because of a pre-existing condition.

Here’s where we get into the real meat-and-potatoes of tax mania, the Universal Health Care cure-all. The thing about the government providing the health care that Obama seems to be ignorant of here, is that there would likely be little if any private market left for health insurance, hence insurance companies would cease offering health insurance, in large part to the high cost of pre-existing conditions. Example: Person needs high cost surgery, buys health insurance, gets the surgery and drops the insurance. The companies will just cease the coverage rather than see the complete draining of their monies.

And the main difference between my plan and Senator Clinton’s plan is that she’d require the government to force you to buy health insurance and she said she’d ‘go after’ your wages if you don’t. Well I believe the reason people don’t have health care isn’t because no one’s forced them to buy it, it’s because no one’s made it affordable – and that’s what we’ll do when I am President.

Presumably, Hillary would offer the same kind of “affordable” health insurance. You dodge the issue of whether or not you’d force it by merely addressing that you’d make it “affordable.” But if your going for so-called “universal health care” you are going to have to opt people into the system. Thanks but no thanks

Source for Obama Speech Quotes: barackobama.com

Posted in Barack Obama, Election, Election 2008, Entertainment, Hillary Clinton, Obama, Presidential, social spending | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

Which is less toxic?

Posted by americana83 on February 16, 2008

Looks like a whole slew of so-called conservatives have jumped on board the McCain bandwagon. It is boiling down to a choice like God gave kind David (after he sinned a great sin): Choose which of these I will do to you: Fall before your enemies, be killed by your enemies, or be plagued by the hand of God for 3 days.

No matter who wins, (save a miracle upturn by Huckabee) they will welcome with open arms both blanket amnesty for (ILLEGAL!) immigrants and gay marriage, as well as attempting to import that wonderful European socialist invention federally funded so-called universal health care.

Wait, before you say “but it will help the children!” Think about these things:

1. The federal government manages social security, the federal funded retirement plan that promises little and is sinking like the titanic in an ice field because they keep tapping money out for illegal immigrants and slush projects2. The federal government “manages” welfare

3. The federal government always goes over budget and yields a poor return.

With the government’s stellar record of managing social spending, do we really want them managing OUR healthcare, (and taxing us like the dickens!) to do it?

I for one don’t. And even if I can afford it, Hillary, I want to have the final decision on whether or not I want to opt in (and I don’t!).

Mirror mirror on the wall, who’s most socialist of them all:

3. McCain
2. Hillary
1. Obama (Endorsed by John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, and Fidel Castro, I mean this guy must be a borderline communist) (In fairness, the Castro endorsement went to Hillary too).

Posted in Election, Election 2008, Presidential, sexuality, social spending | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Wanna Buy Insurance? “NO?” Ok, We’ll Sign You Up! -Hillary

Posted by americana83 on February 6, 2008

Wanna Buy Insurance? “NO?” Ok, We’ll Sign You Up! -Hillary
Presidential Hopeful Hillary wants universal health care, and she wants everyone in the system. She said,

“What we’ve got to do is have shared responsibility. Everybody has to pay something, but obviously on a sliding scale,” Clinton said. “I think you can automatically enroll people, and you will then say, ‘You’ve got to be part of this.’”

“If you don’t start with universal health care, if you don’t say everybody’s going to be in the system, we’ll never get there,” she added.

The money will be taken from you, even if you don’t want it (but only if you could afford to pay for it). She does on to say it will only be a small percentage of your income. Great, another slice of our income going into a bloated government program that will cost so much more than it is worth.

I wonder how much of this money would be used to pay for illegal immigrants and pork barrel spending.

Viva Socialism!


Why is this socialism? It comes from the euphemism “Equitable redistribution of wealth” which basically means, if you have more money than we(the government) think you should, we are going to take from you and use it in ways we feel might benefit society, and the more you make, the larger percentage of it we will take from you. It sort of follows lenin’s old saying “from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.”

Posted in Election 2008, Hillary Clinton, Presidential | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Giuliani and the social conservatives

Posted by americana83 on October 20, 2007

The New York Times made this laughable comment in a recent online article:

 Mr. Giuliani’s road map to the Republican nomination has never depended on securing the votes of even the majority of social conservatives, who tend to be most dominant in the early nominating contests like Iowa and South Carolina. Instead, Mr. Giuliani is betting on strong performances in more moderate states like California, New York and New Jersey in the nation’s superprimary on Feb. 5. 

Only a paper like the NYT could consider California “more moderate” If you believe that California is moderate, please check out my previous blogs most notably the one about Schwarzenegger and his signing of SB777, which basically makes discussion of the traditional family as normal or desirable a hate crime!

If the presidential election comes down to a Giuliani  verses a Hillary or Obama, then there will be no candidate for true social conservatives or Bible believing Christians.

Posted in Christianity, Election, Presidential | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 208 other followers